To assess the first three hypotheses, Pearson’s correlations were used with partial correlations used to account for the effect of state anxiety (state score from the STAI . Tests of normality showed that all variables were normally distributed and hence suitable for this parametric test, except for the following: fixation count to head and body, dwell time to the head and background and time to first fixate the body. For correlations where one variable was not normally distributed both Pearson’s (r) and Spearman’s (rs) analyses were conducted and reported. Partial correlations are based on Pearson’s correlation regardless of distribution. All tests are two-tailed.
Immediately after pre-running had taken place, the attention movement studies are checked for outliers (research circumstances larger than 1.five times the interquartile variety having certain adjustable), because of the examining boxplots. This new outlying analysis items (n = 19) was in fact omitted to possess individual analysis things from inside the eye-record methods , comprising 4.22% of the complete studies.
No significant correlation was found between LSAS scores and time to first fixate the head r (16) = .101, p = .709 and the body r (21) = -.062, p = .790, (r s (21) = -.144, p = .522). This remained the case when controlling for state anxiety using a partial correlation, r (13) = .088, p = .754, and the body r (18) = -.070, p = .7710
502, p = .034 (Fig dos) (disregarding state anxiety) and you may roentgen (15) = -.499, p = .041 (handling to own condition nervousness).
There is certainly zero high relationships ranging from LSAS score and you will first fixation period on human body, roentgen (23) = -.141, p = .521 that has been also the case whenever handling to have state stress playing with a limited relationship r (20) = -.133, p =. 556
There were no significant relationships between LSAS scores and dwell time to the head r (28) = Billings top hookup sites -.073, p = .714 (rs (28) = -.132, p = .502) the body r (30) = -.090, p = .637, and the background r (30) = -.231, p = .220 (rs (30) = -.254, p = .175).
Limited correlations as well as revealed that whenever managing for county nervousness, there’s no extreme relationships between the LSAS score and stay for you personally to the head roentgen (25) = -.063, p = .756, the human body roentgen (27) = -.090, p = .643, and records r (27) = -.231, p = .229.
There was no significant relationship between the LSAS scores and fixation count to the head r (28) = .049, p = .805 (rs (28) = -.055, p = .782), the body r (29) = -.075, p = .700 (rs (21) = -.033, p = .865) and the background r (29) = -.258, p = .176. Partial correlations also showed that when controlling for state anxiety, there were still no significant relationships between the LSAS scores and fixation count to the head r (25) = .068, p = .743, the body r (26) = -.075, p = .704, and the background r (28) = -.258, p = .185
A powerful inverse dating try discover between scanpath length and LSAS rating, r (28) = -.483, p = .008 whenever disregarding state anxiety, and remained whenever condition anxiety is actually controlled for roentgen (26) = -.498, p = .007 (Fig step three).
An effective bad dating is actually found ranging from full saccade number and you can LSAS score, r (29) = -.511, p = .005 whenever overlooking condition anxiety, hence remained significant a when state anxiety was controlled for r (26) = -.516, p = .005. Zero dating try discover anywhere between mean saccade amplitude and you can LSAS score however, roentgen (29) = -.176, p = .362 whether or not state stress are managed having r (26) = -.160, p = .417